Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.5 to 25.8.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.530.3
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding14591016
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1448993
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math14651018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1431977
LMArena Chinese14761014
LMArena Russian1460947
LMArena French1435—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1433978

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1446—

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text14431032
LMArena Creative Writing1415990
LMArena Multi-Turn14521007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper