Model comparison
Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 38.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.09 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.34 | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1366 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 43.4% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | 1416 |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.4% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| LMCA | 39.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | — |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1465 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1375 |
Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1399 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Muse Glimmer?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.