Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.7 to 47.4.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index43.237.2
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14591270
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14481264
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14641274
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14651248
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1278—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14311262
LMArena Chinese14781319
LMArena Russian14621258
LMArena French1436—
LMArena Spanish1443—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14331245

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14461301

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14431274
LMArena Creative Writing14161242
LMArena Multi-Turn14521275
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper