Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Yi-34B

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 37.9 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 75.8% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 14.7% for Yi-34B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Yi-34B specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index43.527.8
Released2026-04-022023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3523

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Coding14591112
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14481104
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74117.39
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Math14651114
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
GPQA Diamond75.8%14.7%
LMArena Expert14651061
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Vision1277—
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Non-English14311079
LMArena Chinese14761176
LMArena French14351081
LMArena Russian14601050
LMArena Spanish14441070
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14331091

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14461094

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITYi-34B
LMArena Text14431129
LMArena Creative Writing14151108
LMArena Multi-Turn14521113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Yi-34B?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Yi-34B better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Yi-34B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper