Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.1

Rank #88 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 21.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 35.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 60.3% for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index43.149.8
Released2026-04-022026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1.05M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0765$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.26$4.25
Results tracked2828

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev13591532
SciCode40%56.4%
WeirdML35.2%60.3%
LMArena Coding14461497
DeepSWE—54.9%
FrontierSWE—12%
ALE-Bench927.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
CritPt0%17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts14381490
DTBench74.9%94.7%
LMCA29.7%48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85155.18
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
Chess Puzzles6%—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math1469—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert14471485
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision12601304

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English14221479
LMArena Chinese14951519
LMArena Russian14341494
LMArena French1459—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following14201466

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query14271483

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text14341486
LMArena Creative Writing14011444
EQ-Bench Creative Writing13051840
LMArena Multi-Turn14421504

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Muse Spark 1.2?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 38.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper