Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 6 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 38.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 40% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Flash.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderGoogleXiaomi
Noometry Index43.541.3
Released2026-04-022025-12-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.23$0.28
Results tracked2821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena WebDev13591330
SciCode40%25.9%
LMArena Coding14471443
ALE-Bench927.17737.95
WeirdML35.2%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
CritPt0%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14391420
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14701396
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert14471425
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14211392
LMArena Chinese14951462
LMArena French14601429
LMArena Russian14341387
LMArena Spanish14171420
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1358

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14201392

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14281409

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14341411
LMArena Creative Writing14021375
LMArena Multi-Turn14411404
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2-Flash?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper