Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Llama 3-8B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 8.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 1.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Llama 3-8B specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index43.525.5
Released2026-04-022024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675—
Output $ / M tokens$0.23—
Results tracked2834

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding14471152
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
ALE-Bench927.17—
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
Chess Puzzles6%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14391133
DTBench74.9%43.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85116.45
CritPt0%—
LMCA29.7%—
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%1.9%
LMArena Math14701151
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond73.2%26.1%
LMArena Expert14471113
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Llama 3-8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English14211098
LMArena Chinese14951076
LMArena French14601159
LMArena Russian14341109
LMArena Spanish14171173
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following14201127

Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query14281128

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text14341166
LMArena Creative Writing14021150
LMArena Multi-Turn14411152
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Llama 3-8B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Llama 3-8B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper