Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GPT-4o mini
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 9 categories and GPT-4o mini in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 10.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 6.9% for GPT-4o mini.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for GPT-4o mini.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 25.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2024-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 128K |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), GPT-4o mini: 22.0 (#335)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 11.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1290 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 3.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 43.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 83.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 72.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, GPT-4o mini: 27.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 17.4% |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#347)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1267 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | 54.4% |
| LMCA | 29.7% | 10.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 126.56 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 10.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 28.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 32.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 50% |
| LiveBench | — | 41.3% |
| PIQA | — | 88.7% |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), GPT-4o mini: 10.4 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1267 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 28% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 36.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 52.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 91.3% |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#284)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 37.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1235 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 8.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 60.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 37.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 36.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.7% |
| MMLU | — | 81.8% |
Multimodal Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), GPT-4o mini: 25.9 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1066 |
| Video-MME | — | 64.8% |
| GeoBench | — | 64% |
| VPCT | — | 34% |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), GPT-4o mini: 42.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1266 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1265 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1275 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1276 |
| LMArena German | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), GPT-4o mini: 61.9 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1258 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 56.8% |
| IFEval | — | 78.2% |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1289 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), GPT-4o mini: 39.5 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1286 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1268 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | 873 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1285 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 67.2% |
| WildBench | — | 79.1% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 28.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than GPT-4o mini?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GPT-4o mini?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; GPT-4o mini lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GPT-4o mini better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 22.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-4o mini share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o mini has 60.