Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 58.8 to 29.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1090 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 20.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1073 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1117 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1064 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 1033 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1070 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1045 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1056 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1071 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1080 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1046 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1053 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.