Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GPT-5.5 Instant
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-5.5 Instant score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 5 categories and GPT-5.5 Instant in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 26.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 68.1% for GPT-5.5 Instant.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 42.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-05-05 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40% | 48.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1433 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1426 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 142.52 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 68.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1420 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 26.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 2.4% |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 82.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1409 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1250 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1403 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1417 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1428 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1392 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1406 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1422 |
Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1419 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1433 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than GPT-5.5 Instant?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-5.5 Instant score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GPT-5.5 Instant better for coding?
GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-5.5 Instant share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 Instant has 27.