Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GPT-5.2 Codex
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-5.2 Codex score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Codex in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.4 to 38.8.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $1.75 / $14 for GPT-5.2 Codex.
- GPT-5.2 Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 42.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-12-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 400K |
| Max output | 33K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | $1.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | $14 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.4 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1339 |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | 1,300 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 66.3% |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, GPT-5.2 Codex: 40.7 (#20)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 66.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), GPT-5.2 Codex: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GPT-5.2 Codex |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than GPT-5.2 Codex?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-5.2 Codex score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GPT-5.2 Codex?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Codex lists at $1.75 and $14.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GPT-5.2 Codex better for coding?
GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.4 versus 38.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GPT-5.2 Codex share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Codex has 5.