Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Yi-1.5-34B
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 34.2 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1160 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1139 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Yi-1.5-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.