Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 28.2.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1268 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1251 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1246 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1255 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.