Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 19.9.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Step 5 Preview specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
ProviderGoogleStepFun
Noometry Index37.347.9
Released—2026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked1818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding12681480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12841465
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
CritPt—20.9%

Math Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math12511470
ProofBench—42%

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert12461470

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English12851432
LMArena Chinese13091519
LMArena Russian12881436
LMArena Spanish13051439
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1311—
LMArena Japanese1272—
LMArena Korean1259—

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12551444

Long Context Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query12761455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text13061442
LMArena Creative Writing12871410
LMArena Multi-Turn12761447

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Step 5 Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper