Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 78.5% for Kimi K2.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 48.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-01-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.25 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1474 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 73.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 70.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 67.3% |
| SciCode | — | 49% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 821.65 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 43.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 63.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,198 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 78.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1453 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 11.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 46.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 69.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 65.3% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.03 |
Math Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1470 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 62.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 92.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1466 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 24.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1430 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1433 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1495 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1441 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1421 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1410 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1450 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1431 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1445 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 86.1% |
| CL-bench | — | 19.3% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 13.2% |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1423 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1444 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Kimi K2.5 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.