Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.6 35B-A3B

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.7 vs 37.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

36.7

Rank #203 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

37.2

Rank #194 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads 51.4 to 33.6.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $1.49 for Qwen3.6 35B-A3B.
  • Qwen3.6 35B-A3B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.737.2
Released2025-05-202026-04-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window33K262K
Max output33K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.12$1.49
Results tracked1814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 36.7 (#190)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
SciCode—35.8%
WeirdML—34.5%
LMArena Coding1269—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 21.9 (#126)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
Terminal-Bench—23%

Reasoning Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 27.2 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.6%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—26%
LMArena Hard Prompts1284—
Mystery Game Puzzles—22%
DTBench—73.9%
LMCA—29.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—44.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.92

Math Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 37.9 (#90)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—20.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1251—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 35B-A3B leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: 51.4 (#63)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
LMArena Expert1245—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English1285—
LMArena Chinese1310—
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1312—
LMArena Japanese1274—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Russian1288—
LMArena Spanish1305—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following1255—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query1277—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Qwen3.6 35B-A3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITQwen3.6 35B-A3B
LMArena Text1306—
LMArena Creative Writing1287—
LMArena Multi-Turn1276—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.7 vs 37.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B-A3B lists at $0.25 and $1.49.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.6 35B-A3B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.4 vs 36.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 35B-A3B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper