Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen Plus
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1303 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen Plus?
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen Plus share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.