Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 50.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 40.5% for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1268 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | 31.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1284 |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1251 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1246 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1255 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1276 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1276 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4b IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.