Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 27.6.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 27.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 15.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1072 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 26.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 34.7% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 52.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.7% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 70.8% |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1111 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 15.7% |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1045 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 64% |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1021 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1021 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1076 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1044 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 935 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 905 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1022 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1085 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1053 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 39.1% |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1044 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1073 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1037 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 9.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.