Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1016 |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 993 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.