Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs o1

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 38.7.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and o1 specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITo1
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index37.340.9
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1852

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), o1: 46.1 (#70)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Coding12681367
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), o1: 27.9 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Hard Prompts12841371
SimpleBench—41.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.91
LiveBench—75.7%

Math o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), o1: 36.1 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Math12511388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), o1: 41.5 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Expert12461361
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), o1: 48.6 (#142)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Non-English12851358
LMArena Chinese13091394
LMArena French13301344
LMArena German13111337
LMArena Japanese12721346
LMArena Korean12591396
LMArena Russian12881356
LMArena Spanish13051345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), o1: 74.8 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Instruction Following12551367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), o1: 50.3 (#9)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Longer Query12761378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference o1 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), o1: 55.6 (#144)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITo1
LMArena Text13061366
LMArena Creative Writing12871348
LMArena Multi-Turn12761369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and o1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper