Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 22.3.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index41.037.3
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked4818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Coding14791268
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
LMArena WebDev1390—
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14431284
SimpleBench60%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—31.5%
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA37.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.12—
ForecastBench62—

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Math14311251
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Expert14391246
GPQA Diamond77.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Non-English14051285
LMArena Chinese14271309
LMArena French14311330
LMArena German14131311
LMArena Japanese13781272
LMArena Korean13801259
LMArena Russian14221288
LMArena Spanish14481305

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Instruction Following14351255

Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Longer Query14551276

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Text14191306
LMArena Creative Writing14121287
LMArena Multi-Turn14441276
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper