Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Mistral Medium 3
Gemma 3n E4b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#203); Mistral Medium 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.
- Mistral Medium 3 accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 33K.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 134.07 |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Mistral Medium 3: 34.1
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 21.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Mistral Medium 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Mistral Medium 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Mistral Medium 3?
Gemma 3n E4b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#203); Mistral Medium 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Mistral Medium 3?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 lists at $0.40 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3 does, with 131K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Mistral Medium 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3 has 2.