Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Mistral Medium 3

MiniMax-M2 has enough public results to be ranked (#204); Mistral Medium 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3 Mistral AI

37.0

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • MiniMax-M2 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.
  • MiniMax-M2 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 131K.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Mistral Medium 3 specifications
MiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index37.437.0
Released2025-10-272025-05-07
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K131K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$2
Results tracked212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Mistral Medium 3: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—
LMArena Coding1370—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Mistral Medium 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Mistral Medium 3: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1357—
Epoch Capabilities Index—134.07

Math Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Mistral Medium 3: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Math1352—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Mistral Medium 3: 34.6

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
Confabulations—21.9%
LMArena Expert1337—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Mistral Medium 3: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Non-English1313—
LMArena Chinese1366—
LMArena French1335—
LMArena German1355—
LMArena Russian1331—
LMArena Spanish1326—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Mistral Medium 3: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Instruction Following1328—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Mistral Medium 3: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Longer Query1331—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Mistral Medium 3: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Mistral Medium 3
LMArena Text1340—
LMArena Creative Writing1286—
LMArena Multi-Turn1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Mistral Medium 3?

MiniMax-M2 has enough public results to be ranked (#204); Mistral Medium 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2 or Mistral Medium 3?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3 lists at $0.40 and $2.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2 does, with 205K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Mistral Medium 3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper