Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 35.1.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.347.7
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1851

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Coding12681488
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
ALE-Bench—1,093

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Hard Prompts12841470
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—37.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.05

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Math12511475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—25.6%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—72.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—96.1%
ProofBench—16%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Expert12461491
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Vision—1283
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English12851446
LMArena Chinese13091521
LMArena French13301471
LMArena German13111450
LMArena Japanese12721443
LMArena Korean12591427
LMArena Russian12881446
LMArena Spanish13051464

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following12551451

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query12761468

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITKimi K2.6
LMArena Text13061455
LMArena Creative Writing12871434
LMArena Multi-Turn12761453
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Kimi K2.6 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper