Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Granite 4.2 30b
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 27.8 to 19.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 41.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1396 |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1374 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1406 |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1414 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1343 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1347 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1359 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1361 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1339 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Granite 4.2 30b?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Granite 4.2 30b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.