Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 50.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1268 |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1251 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1246 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1309 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1311 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1272 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1305 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1255 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1276 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.