Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 19.9.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-6.1 Sol specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index37.365.6
Released—2026-09-29
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked1834

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Coding12681487
DeepSWE—75.2%
FrontierCode—50.2%
LMArena WebDev—1755
SciCode—55.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
APEX-Agents—60%
GDP.pdf—32%

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts12841466
ARC-AGI-2—94.2%
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—95.5%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
Chess Puzzles—61%
EBR-Bench—54.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles—80%
Epoch Capabilities Index—166.09

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Math12511464
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—100%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—99%

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Expert12461502
GPQA Diamond—95.4%
SimpleQA Verified—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision—1288
Furniture Assembly—80%

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English12851438
LMArena Chinese13091477
LMArena Russian12881455
LMArena French1330—
LMArena German1311—
LMArena Japanese1272—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Spanish1305—

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following12551468

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query12761465

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text13061447
LMArena Creative Writing12871432
LMArena Multi-Turn12761449

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper