Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

67.8

Rank #4 Confirmed

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5 leads 77.2 to 19.9.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index67.837.3
Released2026-07-24—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked5718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Coding15341268
DeepSWE73.6%—
FrontierCode53.4%—
CursorBench46.6%—
LMArena WebDev1691—
FrontierSWE52%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML91.8%—
ALE-Bench2,165—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
APEX-Agents65.8%—
OSWorld 2.031.4%—
τ²-bench Banking48.7%—
PostTrainBench35%—
BALROG63.4%—
GBAEval79.6%—
GDP.pdf24%—
Vending-Bench 211,182—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts15261284
ARC-AGI-290.4%—
SimpleBench80.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—31.5%
NYT Connections (extended)94.3%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt29.1%—
Chess Puzzles42%—
EBR-Bench45.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles59%—
DTBench97.9%—
LMCA64.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.12—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.78—

Math Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Math15311251
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)85.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 473.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Expert15571246
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
SimpleQA Verified59.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Vision1319—
Blueprint-Bench 230.4%—
Furniture Assembly60.8%—
LMArena Document1516—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Non-English15011285
LMArena Chinese15741309
LMArena French15191330
LMArena German15241311
LMArena Japanese15161272
LMArena Korean15211259
LMArena Russian15071288
LMArena Spanish15191305

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Instruction Following15171255

Long Context Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Longer Query15151276

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Gemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Text15071306
LMArena Creative Writing14911287
LMArena Multi-Turn14991276
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2133—
EQ-Bench 41385—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper