Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Pro in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 76.8% for GPT-5 Pro.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 46.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 272K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $120 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 150.28 |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-5 Pro?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.