Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GLM-4.5-Air

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

GLM-4.5-Air Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.9

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and GLM-4.5-Air in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 50.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 43% for GLM-4.5-Air.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GLM-4.5-Air specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index37.338.9
Released—2025-07-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$1.10
Results tracked1827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Coding12681397
GSO—2.9%

Reasoning GLM-4.5-Air leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%43%
LMArena Hard Prompts12841379
ForecastBench—59.2

Math GLM-4.5-Air leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Math12511396
Omni-MATH—39.1%

Knowledge Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Expert12461370
Humanity's Last Exam—8.1%
MMLU-Pro—76.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—59.4%

Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Non-English12851366
LMArena Chinese13091426
LMArena French13301399
LMArena German13111377
LMArena Japanese12721348
LMArena Korean12591308
LMArena Russian12881373
LMArena Spanish13051386

Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Instruction Following12551354
IFEval—81.2%

Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Longer Query12761366

Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGLM-4.5-Air
LMArena Text13061384
LMArena Creative Writing12871343
LMArena Multi-Turn12761371
WildBench—78.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GLM-4.5-Air share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper