Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 33.7 to 16.8.
  • Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Gemma 3 4B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
  • Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Sonar specifications
Gemma 3 4BSonar
ProviderGooglePerplexity
Noometry Index28.138.5
Released2025-03-122024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.04$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$1
Results tracked227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1230—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1253—
DTBench50.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Sonar leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1239—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena German1281—
LMArena Russian1294—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1239—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
LMArena Longer Query1273—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BSonar
LMArena Text1291—
LMArena Creative Writing1271—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—
LMArena Multi-Turn1255—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Sonar?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Sonar better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.9 vs 35.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 3 4B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper