Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Mixtral 8x7B
Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 6 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemma 3 4B leads 65.2 to 51.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B and 30.6% for Mixtral 8x7B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $0.70 for Mixtral 8x7B.
- Gemma 3 4B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 32K.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 32K |
| Max output | 4K | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1126 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 49.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Mixtral 8x7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1115 |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 49.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 118.47 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |
Math Mixtral 8x7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1147 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 30.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1088 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |
Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1077 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1114 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1090 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 968 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1109 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1103 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1115 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Mixtral 8x7B?
Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Mixtral 8x7B?
Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x7B lists at $0.70 and $0.70.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 4B does, with 131K tokens against 32K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Mixtral 8x7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.