Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3 4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 28.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.5 to 33.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 34% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 28.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1230 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 19.6% |
Reasoning Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1253 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 50.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 116.02 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 25.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMCA | — | 2.8% |
Math Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1239 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 23.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1223 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.4% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1273 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1281 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1294 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1239 |
Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1273 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1291 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1271 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1255 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1068 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 4B?
Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3 4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.3 vs 28.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3 4B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.