Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 3.2 90B

Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3 27B leads 25.9 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 74% for Gemma 3 27B and 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
Gemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index30.827.5
Released2025-03-112024-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—
LMArena Coding1322—

Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 90B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—
BALROG—27.3%

Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04125.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1340—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
LiveBench50%—

Math Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%2.6%
MATH Level 574%39.4%
LiveBench Math55.4%—
LMArena Math1312—

Knowledge Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond47.7%41%
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1304—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision11641000
GeoBench52%52%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1334—
LMArena Chinese1346—
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Russian1349—
LMArena Spanish1349—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1321—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BLlama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1358—
LMArena Creative Writing1346—
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LMArena Multi-Turn1345—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Llama 3.2 90B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper