Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Yi-34B

Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Yi-34B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.5 to 34.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 74% for Gemma 3 27B and 5.1% for Yi-34B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Yi-34B specifications
Gemma 3 27BYi-34B
ProviderGoogle01.AI
Noometry Index30.827.8
Released2025-03-112023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked4323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-34B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Coding13221112
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13401104
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04117.39
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
LiveBench50%—

Math Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Math13121114
MATH Level 574%5.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
GPQA Diamond47.7%14.7%
LMArena Expert13041061
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Vision1164—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Non-English13341079
LMArena Chinese13461176
LMArena French13681081
LMArena German13621042
LMArena Japanese1287993
LMArena Korean1308959
LMArena Russian13491050
LMArena Spanish13491070

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13211091
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Yi-34B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query13331094
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BYi-34B
LMArena Text13581129
LMArena Creative Writing13461108
LMArena Multi-Turn13451113
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Yi-34B?

Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Yi-34B better for coding?

Yi-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Yi-34B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper