Model comparison
Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 2-7B
Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 2-7B in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.5 to 28.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-11 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.16 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1002 |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1009 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | 99.06 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1042 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1304 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1368 | 970 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1349 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | 1006 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |
Long Context Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 999 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1345 | 1029 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 27B better than Llama 2-7B?
Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 27B or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Llama 2-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.2 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Llama 2-7B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.