Model comparison
Gemma 3 27B vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 3 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 4 categories and Granite 4.0 Micro in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3 27B leads 25.5 to 9.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B and 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.08 / $0.16 for Gemma 3 27B.
- Gemma 3 27B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-11 | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 8K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.16 | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 43 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | — |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |
Math Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1304 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena French | 1368 | — |
| LMArena German | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1349 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1345 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 27B better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 3 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Granite 4.0 Micro?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Gemma 3 27B lists at $0.08 and $0.16.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 27B does, with 131K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.