Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 24% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.