Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen Turbo

Qwen Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 2 shared benchmarks.

20.7

Rank #348 Reported

26.8

Rank #329 Reported

Summary

They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Turbo in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Turbo leads 22.2 to 7.1.
The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 41.8% for Qwen Turbo.
Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Qwen Turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 1B	Qwen Turbo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	7.2%	—

Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Qwen Turbo: —

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 1B	Qwen Turbo
Chess Puzzles	0%	—

Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 1B	Qwen Turbo
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	1.1%	6.1%
MATH Level 5	—	56.2%

Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 1B	Qwen Turbo
GPQA Diamond	19.9%	41.8%

Qwen Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.