Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 1B
Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3 1B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 1.0 Pro leads 15.6 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 34% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 21.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |
Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 19.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 1B?
Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3 1B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.