Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 37.7 to 7.0.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index21.137.7
Released2025-03-122026-03-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked430

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena WebDev—1398
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
LMArena Coding—1454
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles0%—
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1422
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.85

Math MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
ProofBench—3%
LMArena Math—1420

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
GPQA Diamond19.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%
LMArena Expert—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English—1382
LMArena Chinese—1441
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Russian—1383
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following—1405

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query—1419

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text—1405
LMArena Creative Writing—1354
LMArena Multi-Turn—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper