Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 41.4 to 7.0.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1445 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.