Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 7.0.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), MiMo-V2-Omni: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.