Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.5 to 7.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1483 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Kimi K2.5 Instant: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1443 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1443 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1438 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1430 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.