Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 41.5 to 7.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 44.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1502 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1487 |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1480 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1477 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1477 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.