Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 4 Scout in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 4 Scout leads 31.9 to 7.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 51.8% for Llama 4 Scout.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Llama 4 Scout specifications
Gemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index21.127.7
Released2025-03-122025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
LMArena Coding—1286
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Llama 4 Scout leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%28.1%

Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1266
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Llama 4 Scout leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1287
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Llama 4 Scout leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond19.9%51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%
LMArena Expert—1235

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English—1252
LMArena Chinese—1255
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1278

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
IFEval—81.8%
LMArena Instruction Following—1248

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
Fiction.LiveBench—36%
LMArena Longer Query—1265

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text—1279
LMArena Creative Writing—1249
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1280

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Llama 4 Scout share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper