Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Llama 2-7B
Llama 2-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 2-7B in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 2-7B leads 27.7 to 7.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 28.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1002 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1009 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 973 |
| LMArena French | — | 969 |
| LMArena German | — | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1006 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 999 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Llama 2-7B?
Llama 2-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Llama 2-7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.