Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Gemma 3 1B
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 21.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 7.2% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 19.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Gemma 3 1B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 3 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Gemma 3 1B?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Gemma 3 1B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 1B has 4.