Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 18.5.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 35.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.